Educational worksheet · cryptosignalsdesk.online · Updated 24 October 2026

FTMO vs MyForexFunds: Compare Programme Docs and Canada Conditions

An FTMO versus MyForexFunds comparison needs matching evidence before it needs a winner. On 24 October 2026, FTMO's cited CFD FAQ describes named account routes, while the cited MyForexFunds page announces a later relaunch date. These documents have different purposes. This guide compares their scope, not personal suitability or future returns.

Read the separate FTMO programme-path guide

What each source is describing

The FTMO CFD FAQ distinguishes 1-Step and 2-Step Challenge routes and Instant. The account-type reference describes these as simulated trading products. Our separate FTMO programme guide explains the stages; this article does not repeat every objective or price.

The MyForexFunds page announces 23 November 2026 and discusses an old-account restoration process. It is not the same kind of document as a complete, current purchase specification. The distinction prevents a past programme description or a planned event from being treated as an observed new offer.

Choose comparison fields before looking for a preferred answer

For each provider, record the named product, document date, environment, relevant stage and applicable conditions. Compare the same type of field on both sides. Mark a missing or differently scoped field as not established rather than importing an older rule.

A fictional comparison might have a documented phase structure in one column and only a future announcement in another. That is a useful difference in available evidence. It does not support a fabricated price comparison, an automatic-access claim or a payout ranking.

Different source purposes require different comparison labels
QuestionFTMO source scopeMyForexFunds source scope
What is described?Named CFD account routesDated relaunch/restoration announcement
Are all details compared here?No: selected route descriptions onlyNo: an announcement is not a full specification
Country conditionsCanada not named in the reviewed CFD residence table; other criteria applyCanada is explicitly listed in the reviewed MFF terms
Is a personal account active?Not verified by this articleNot established by an announced date
Can old terms be transferred?Keep the actual product and versionKeep restoration separate from a new offer
What about HashHedge?A different provider with its own conditionsA different provider with its own conditions

For a Canadian comparison, do not leave a known exclusion implicit

The reviewed MFF terms explicitly list Canada as excluded. Canada does not appear in the residence-restriction table in the separate FTMO CFD eligibility FAQ reviewed here. That FTMO page also sets age, sanctions and other personal criteria. This is a difference between the published lists, not an individual acceptance decision.

A consistent Canadian record format can still retain each source's original currency, timestamp and product version. No CAD price, exchange rate, private account outcome or legal right is determined here.

Use a third provider as a third comparison, not a substitute history

If you also consider HashHedge through the sponsored link, add a separate column using its own terms and permitted markets. Do not copy a Forex platform, phase count or account label from another provider into that column.

This article has not purchased or tested an account, verified a payment, inspected a private customer case or made a legal determination. It answers how to compare the reviewed documents honestly, before any optional registration with a different provider.

Sources and rule dates